Comments on: Secret History of Man

By: boarderis4snow

boarderis4snow — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:42:15 +0000

Umm.. big contradiction there, man.

You can’t have FOSSILIZED trees with INTACT leaves. It’s impossible. Fossilization = Replacing organic material with minerals. Thus, leaves would NOT be intact, they’d be fossilized.

By: MrBeerbug

MrBeerbug — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:51:16 +0000

The mammoth may have died from a heartattack while eating and the the winther kicked in. A mammoth was a very furry animal living in a cold environment so it is likely that it was frozen several years before the iceage came. We have only found a very few mammoths like that. It would be more interesting if we had found entire herds frozen with food in the mouth.

By: Hr3shy

Hr3shy — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:52:56 +0000

i wish i could read somthing about that, sounds quite intresting.

By: Ispit12

Ispit12 — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 04:23:30 +0000

Unfortunately, your not into education. The theory of evolution came from Chales Darwin in 1859. Genome Project came out in the early 1990’s and was only used to catorgorize species with DNA SEQUENCING, NOT evolution.

By: EasternGateGuardian

EasternGateGuardian — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:50:47 +0000

this isn’t unusual, Out of place relics are all over. They could be explained this way, an event so violent, that the great Rockies and Himalayas, appeared over night. So the layers of sediments could have been stirred, hence the vases found in the layer attributed to been 2millions years old. FACT : whole trees have been found fossiled, with all the leaves intact…mammoths have been found frozen, with food in their mouths…

By: fazelife

fazelife — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:18:19 +0000

both these guys have pedo glasses

By: siriusisastar

siriusisastar — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:48:50 +0000

“Not much evidence of evolution…”…??? What??? LOL
These videos pre-date the Genome Project, firstly.
Secondly, this guy’s “science” is as sketchy as a creationist’s, just the other way.
Carbon-14 is but one of over 200 methods used to date objects.
Tens of thousands of scientists in over 20 different fields agree with the facts.
I’m a huge “ancient astronaut theory” fan, but guys like this do it a disservice, unfortunately.

By: masterkudjo

masterkudjo — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:03:29 +0000

But yes you got it right, blah blah is all what she said is worth

By: L0K3

L0K3 — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:58:38 +0000

Gee don’t we have all these machines now blah blah

By: aligator98

aligator98 — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:42:39 +0000

He makes good points, there is a lot of physical evidence out there, like the ohio mounds with skeletons of tall people, you won’t find that in your school books, there is a reason we are in the dark over our orgins, why do you think royalty exist to this day? are they descendents of an old civilization ? Sumerian civilization may have our greatest written evidence of our origins, yet few scholars will even look at sumeria, because they are committed to their position despite the evidence.